دوفصلنامه روانشناسی خانواده

نشریه انجمن علمی روانشناسی ایران

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اخبار و اعلانات

اشتراک نشریه

راهنمای تنظیم مقاله

شرایط و ضوابط ارسال مقاله

فرم های نشریه

هزینه های بررسی مقاله

ارسال مقاله

داوران

راهنمای پابلونز برای داوران

حساسیت به قربانی شدن، سوگیری اسناد خصمانه و نشخوار ذهنی خشم به‌عنوان پیش بین وضعیت زناشویی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه روان شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 کارشناسی ارشد، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

وضعیت زناشویی، ارزیابی کلی از کیفیت رابطه زناشویی به معنای  رابطه عاشقانه (رضایتمندی) یا غیرعاشقانه (عدم رضایتمندی) کنونی فرد است و پرخاشگری زوجین نسبت به همدیگر یکی از رفتارهای منفی است که در نارضایتی زناشویی نقش دارد. ﻫﺪف از ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ، مطالعه حساسیت به قربانی شدن، سوگیری اسناد خصمانه و نشخوار ذهنی خشم در پیش بینی وضعیت زناشویی زوجین شهر اردبیل بود. روش پژوهش حاضر توصیفی-همبستگی بود و جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل زوجین 20 تا 50 ساله ساکن شهر اردبیل در سال 1399 بودند که از بین آنان 150 نفر نمونه به شیوه در دسترس انتخاب شدند و به سیاهه حساسیت به عدالت (JSA، خرده مقیاس حساسیت به قربانی‌شدن)، پرسشنامه سوگیری اسناد خصمانه (SIP-HAB)، مقیاس نشخوار ذهنی خشم (ARS) و پرسشنامه وضعیت زناشویی گلومبوک راست (GRIMS) پاسخ دادند. داده ها بوسیله آزمون همبستگی پیرسون و تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه تحلیل شدند. نتایج آزمون همبستگی پیرسون نشان داد که بین سوگیری اسناد خصمانه، حساسیت به قربانی شدن و نشخوار فکری خشم با مشکلات زناشویی رابطه مستقیم و معنی داری وجود دارد (001/0>P). همچنین نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون نشان داد که حساسیت به قربانی شدن، سوگیری اسناد خصمانه و نشخوار خشم به‌گونه مثبت و معنادار مشکلات زناشویی را پیش بینی کردند. حساسیت به قربانی-شدن، سوگیری اسناد خصمانه و نشخوار خشم به عنوان عوامل شناختی موثر در بروز رفتار پرخاشگرانه در چارچوب نظریه پردازش اطلاعات اجتماعی مورد بحث قرار گرفت و نقش این متغیرها در بروز مشکلات زناشویی بررسی شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The role of victim sensitivity, hostile attribution bias and anger rumination in predicting marital status

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fereshteh Pourmohseni Koluri 1
  • Hanieh Ranjbar 2

1 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Payme Noor, Tehran, Ira

2 M.A in Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Payme Noor, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Marital status is a general assessment of the quality of a marital relationship, i.e., a person's current romantic (satisfaction) or non-romantic (unsatisfactory) relationship, and couples' aggression towards each other is one of the negative behaviors that play a role in marital dissatisfaction. The purpose of this study was the role of sensitivity to victimization, hostile attribute, ion and anger rumination in predicting marital status. This research was a descriptive correlational study. The population included people aged 20 to 50 years living in Ardabil city; 150 samples were selected and studied by convenience sampling method and completed the Justice Sensitivity Inventory (JSA, victim sensitivity sub-scale), Hostile Attributional Bias Questionnaire (SIP-HBQ), Anger Rumination Scale (ARS) and Golomboc-Rast Marital Status Questionnaire (GRIMS). Pearson correlation analysis and multivariate regression were used to analyze the data. The Pearson correlation test results showed a positive and significant relationship between sensitivity to victimization, hostile attribution bias, and anger rumination with marital problems (P <0.001). Also, regression analysis results showed that the sensitivity to victimization, hostile attribution bias and anger rumination significantly predict marital problems. Sensitivity to victimization, hostile attribution and anger rumination as cognitive factors influencing the occurrence of aggressive behavior in the framework of social information processing theory are discussed. The role of these variables in the occurrence of marital problems was investigated.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • sensitivity to victimization
  • hostile attribution
  • anger rumination and marital status
مراجع
Ahmadi, K., Ashrafi, S., Kimiaee, S., & Afzali, M. (2010). Effect of family problem-solving on marital satisfaction. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10, 682-687. [In Persian].
Allen, J. J., Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2018). The general aggression models. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 75–80.
Birkley, E. L., & Eckhardt, C. I. (2015). Anger, hostility, internalizing negative emotions, and intimate partner violence perpetration: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review 37, 40–56.
Besharat, M.A. (2002). Preliminary study of psychometric properties of Glombook-Right marital status questionnaire. Research report of Tehran University. [In Persian].Besharat, M. A., & Mohammadmehr, R. (2009). Psychometric properties of Anger Rumination Scale. Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, 65, 36-43. [In Persian].
Bondü, R., and Elsner, B. (2015). Justice sensitivity in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 24 (2), 420–441.
Bondü, R., and Krahé, B. (2014). Links of justice sensitivity and rejection sensitivity with aggression in childhood and adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 41 (4), 353-368.
Bondü, R., & Richter, P. (2016). Linking forms and functions of aggression in adults to justice and rejection sensitivity. Psychology of Violence, 6, 292–302.
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and Loss: Attachment, 2nd Ed. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Coccaro, E.F., Noblett, K., & McCloskey, M.S. (2009). Attributional and emotional responses to socially ambiguous cues: validation of a new assessment of social/emotional information processing in healthy adults and impulsive aggressive patients. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 43 (10), 915-925.

Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74.
Curtis, D. S., Epstein, N. B., & Wheeler, B. (2015). Relationship satisfaction mediates the link between partner aggression and relationship dissolution: The importance of considering severity. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 1-22.
Denson, T. F. (2013). The multiple systems models of angry rumination. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 103–123.
DiBello, A. M., Preddy, T. M., Overup, C. S., & Neighbors, C. (2017). Understanding the context of romantic partner relational victimization: Links between relationship satisfaction, depressive symptoms, and alcohol-related problems. Psychology of Violence, 7(4), 543–552.
Gerlach, T. M., Allemand, M., Agroskin, D., and Denissen, J. J. A. (2012). Justice sensitivity and forgiveness in close interpersonal relationships: the mediating role of mistrustful, legitimizing, and pro-relationship cognitions. Journal of Personality. 80, 1373–1413.
Goldstein, S. E. (2011). Relational aggression in young adults' friendships and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 18, 645–656.
Gollwitzer, M., Rothmund, T., and Süssenbach, P. (2013). The Sensitivity to Mean Intentions (SeMI) model: basic assumptions, recent findings, and potential avenues for future research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,7, 415–426.
Gollwitzer, M., Süssenbach, P., & Hannuschke, M. (2015). Victimization experiences and the stabilization of victim sensitivity. Front Psychology, 6, 439-451.
Hammett, J. F., Lavner, J. A., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2017). Intimate partner aggression and marital satisfaction: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–19.
Hashemi, T., Mohebbi, M., & Alizadeh Maralani, F. (2020). The mediating role of reactive aggression in the relationship between victim sensitivity and loneliness. Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologists, 15 (59), 435-446. [In Persian].
Kokkinos, C. M., Karagianni, K., & Voulgaridou, I. (2017). Relational aggression, big five and hostile attribution bias in adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 52, 101–113.
Martinelli, A., Ackermann, K., Bernhard, A., Freitag, C. M., & Schwenck, C. (2018). Hostile attribution bias and aggression in children and adolescents: A systematic literature review on the influence of aggression subtype and gender. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39, 25–32.
Mayers, A. Introduction SPSS in psychology. (2013). Translated by: Akbar Rezaei. Tehran.: Aydin Publication.1396. [In Persian].
National Statistics Center of Iran. (2020). Statistics and Divorce Report. www.amar.org.ir.
Peled M, Moretti MM. (2010). Ruminating on rumination: Are rumination on anger and sadness differentially related to aggression and depressed mood? Journal of Psychopathology & Behavioral Assessment, 32(1), 108–117.
Pitula, C., Murray-Close, D., Banny, A. M., & Crick, N. R. (2015). Prospective associations between peer aggression and victimization: The moderating roles of physiological stress reactivity and gender. Social Development, 24(3), 621–639.
Rothmund, T., Gollwitzer, M., Bender, J., and Klimmt, C. (2015). Short- and longterm effects of virtual violence on cooperation and social trust. Media Psychology, 18, 106–133.
Rust, J., Bennun, I., Crow, M., & Golombok, S. (1986). The Golombok-Rust inventory of marital state questionnaire. Sexual and Marital Therapy, 1, 55-60.
Schmitt, M. (1996). Individual differences in Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice (SBI). Personality. Individual Differences, 21, 3–20.
Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., and Arbach, D. (2005). Justice sensitivity: assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological. Assessment, 21, 202–211.
Setchell, S., Fritz, P. T., & Glasgow, J. (2017). Relation between social information processing and intimate partner violence in dating couples. Aggressive Behavior, 43(4), 329–341.
Sukhodolsky DG, Golub A, Cromwell EN. (2001). Development and validation of the anger rumination scale. Personality & Individual Differences; 31(5):689–700.
Tuente, S. K., Bogaerts, S., & Veling, Y. (2019). Hostile attribution bias and aggression in adults - a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 46, 66-81.
Voulgaridou, I., & Kokkinos, C. M. (2015). Relational aggression in adolescents: A review of theoretical and empirical research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 87–97.
Wang, Y., Cao, S., Dong, Y., & Xia, L- X. (2019). Hostile attribution bias and angry rumination: A longitudinal study of undergraduate students. PLoS ONE, 14(5), e0217759.
Wang, X., Yang, L., Yang, J., Gao, L., Zhao, F., Xie, X., & Lei, L. (2018). Trait anger and aggression: A moderated mediation model of anger rumination and moral disengagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 44–49.
Watt, M. E., & Scrandis, D. A. (2013). Traumatic childhood exposures in the lives of male perpetrators of female intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(14) 2813–2830
Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2010). The anatomy of anger: An integrative cognitive model of trait anger and reactive aggression. Journal of Personality, 78(1),9–38.
Yaros, A., Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. (2016). Parental aggression as a predictor of boys' hostile attribution across the transition to middle school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(5), 452–458.
دوفصلنامه روانشناسی خانواده
دوره 8، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 16
بهمن 1400
صفحه 73-85
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار