مقایسه اثربخشی آموزش پیش از ازدواج به شیوه گاتمن و مدل سیمبیس (SYMBIS) بر الگوها و آسیب‌های زوج‌های نامزد ترکمن

قزلسفلو, مهدی; رستمی, مهدی

doi:10.22034/ijfp.2021.247985

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ استادیار گروه روان شناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه گنبد کاووس، گنبد، ایران

² دکترای مشاوره خانواده، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

https://doi.org/10.22034/ijfp.2021.247985

چکیده

دوران نامزدی و سال‌های اول ازدواج از مقاطع مهم در چرخه زندگی خانوادگی است. هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین اثربخشی آموزش پیش از ازدواج به شیوه گاتمن در مقایسه با مدل سیمبیس (SYMBIS) بر الگوها و آسیب‌های زوج‌های نامزد ترکمن بود. روش پژوهش نیمه تجربی با دو گروه آزمایش، یک گروه گواه، طرح پیش‌آزمون، پس‌آزمون و پیگیری 3 ماهه بود . 24 زوج از بین زوج‌های نامزد ترکمن که در بازه زمانی مرداد تا آبان ماه 1398 به مرکز مشاوره راه نوین زندگی شهرستان گنبدکاووس مراجعه کرده بودند به‌صورت هدفمند انتخاب و به‌صورت تصادفی در دو گروه آزمایشی غنی‌سازی پیش از ازدواج به شیوه گاتمن (8 زوج=16 نفر)، غنی‌سازی پیش از ازدواج مبتنی بر مدل سیمبیس (8 زوج= 16 نفر) و گروه گواه (8 زوج=16 نفر) جایگزین شدند. جلسات گروه آموزشی پیش از ازدواج به شیوه گاتمن به مدت 8 جلسه و به مدت 4 هفته 90 دقیقه‌ای به‌صورت دو جلسه در هفته و گروه آموزشی پیش از ازدواج به شیوه سیمبیس نیز به مدت 8 جلسه و به مدت 4 هفته 90 دقیقه‌ای هفته‌ای دو جلسه اجرا شد. شرکت‌کنندگان هر سه گروه پرسشنامه ارزیابی و سنجش ‌الگوها و آسیب‌های پیش از ازدواج رستمی، نوابی‌نژاد و فرزاد (1398) را در سه مرحله تکمیل کردند. داده‌ها با استفاده از آزمون تحلیل واریانس مختلط با اندازه‌گیری مکرر تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان داد تأثیر مداخله پیش از ازدواج گاتمن و مداخله پیش از ازدواج مدل سیمبیس بر الگوهای ناکارآمد ارتباطی (44/6 F=، 003/0P=)، الگوهای ناکارآمد مدیریت رابطه (68/3 F=، 033/0P=)، نظام ارزشی زوج‌ها (17/9 F=، 001/0P=)، ذهنیت طرحواره‌ای (80/3 F=، 030/0P=) و اثرات مخرب خانواده اصلی (58/11 F=، 001/0P=) مؤثرند و این تأثیر در مرحله پیگیری پایدار مانده است. همچنین نتایج آزمون تعقیبی توکی نشان داد که بین مداخله پیش از ازدواج گاتمن و مدل سیمبیس تفاوتی وجود ندارد. از آنجایی که هر دو روش منجر به بهبود الگوها و آسیب‌های پیش از ازدواج در شرکت‌کنندگان می‌شود، می‌توان از آن به‌عنوان مداخله‌‌ای مؤثر برای حل مشکلات و بهبود رابطه زوج‌های نامزد استفاده کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Gottman-Based Premarital Training and the SYMBIS Model on the Patterns and damages of Turkmen Engagement Couples

نویسندگان [English]

mehdi ghezelseflo ¹
Mehdi Rostami ²

¹ Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and physical education, Gonbad Kavoos University, Gonbad Kavoos, Iran

² PhD in Family Counselling, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Engagement and the first years of marriage are important milestones in the family life cycle. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of Gottman's premarital education in comparison with the SYMBIS model on the patterns and injuries of Turkmen married couples. The research method was quasi-experimental with two experimental groups, a control group, pre-test, post-test, and 3-month follow-up and 24 couples from Turkmen couples who referred to Gonbadkavos New Life Counseling Center from July to October 2019. Purposefully selected and randomly divided into two groups of experimental marital enrichment by Gottman method (8 couples = 16 persons), SIMBIS model pre-marital enrichment (8 couples = 16 persons), and control group (8 couples = 16 persons). Were replaced. Gottman's premarital training sessions lasted 8 sessions for 4 weeks, 90 minutes two sessions per week, and SYMBIS premarital training sessions for 8 sessions, 90 minutes weekly for 4 weeks. Was. Participants in all three groups completed the Questionnaire Evaluation and Measurement Patterns and Premarital damage Rostami, Navabinejad, and Farzad (2019). Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. The results showed that the effect of Gottman's premarital intervention and SIMBIS's premarital intervention on dysfunctional communication patterns (F = 6.44, P = 0.003), ineffective relationship management patterns (F = 3.68, P = 0.033), Couples' value system (F = 9.17, P = 0.001), schema mentality (F = 3.80, P = 0.030), and the destructive effects of the main family (F = 11.58, P = 0.001) are effective. Influence remained constant at follow-up. The results of the Tukey post hoc test also showed that there was no difference between Gottman's premarital intervention and the SYMBIS model. Since both methods lead to improved patterns of pre-marriage trauma and trauma for participants, it can be used as an effective intervention to resolve problems and improve the couple's relationship.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Premarital
Gottman
Symbis
Engagement Couples

مراجع

Asadishishegaran, S., Ghamari, H., Sheikholslamy, A. (2016). The effect of communication skills training on constructive and non-constructive conflict resolution styles in engagements. Biannual Journal of Applied Counseling, 6(1), 77-88. [In Persian].

Babcock, J.C., Gottman, J.M., Ryan, K.D., Gottman, J.S. (2013). A component analysis of a brief psycho-educational couples' workshop: one-year follow-up results. Journal of Family Therapy, 35,252-280.

Berger, R., & Hannah, M. T. (1999). Preventive Approach in Couple Therapy. North Carolina: Edward Brother.

Borowski S. C., & Tambling R. B. (2015). Applying the health belief model to young individuals’ beliefs and preferences about premarital counseling. The Family Journal, 23, 221-236.

Coen, B. (2012). Fundamentals of sociology, translated by Tavassoli Abbas, Fazel reza, Tehran: Samat publication. [In Persian].

Crawford, S. C. (2009). Efficacy of the Parrott's couples mentoring program in a community setting. Regent University.

Dadvandi, M., Navabinezhad, sh., farzad, v. (2018). A Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Gottman Couples Therapy and Emotion-Focused Couples Therapy Approaches on Marital Adjustment in Families. The Women and Families Cultural-Educational, 13(43), 117-132. [In Persian].

Esmaeily, M., Dehdast, K. (1393). Expression of a Conceptual Pattern from the Relations of the Engaging Period Conflicts (before Marriage) by Marital Satisfaction (after Marriage). Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 4(3), 405-447. [In Persian].

Gottman, J. M. (1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically-based marital therapy. WW Norton & Company.

Gottman, J., & Gottman, J. (2017). The natural principles of love. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9(1), 7-26.

Gottman, J. M., & Gottman, J. S. (2015). 10 Principles for doing Effective Couples Therapy (Norton Series on Interpersonal Neurobiology). New York: Norton.

Hadavand Aval, G., mehrabi koushki, H., yazdkhasti, B. (2017). Study the effect of ethnicity on Mental health, Spousal abuse, social support and Marital satisfaction. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological, 15(2), 81-104. [In Persian].

Havassi, N., Zahrakar, K., Mohsenzadeh, F. (2017). A Study on the Efficacy of Gottman Marital Therapy as a Group Method in Reduction of Marital Burnout. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 4(6), 59-64. [In Persian].

Helms, S. W., Sullivan, T. N., Corona, R., & Taylor, K. A. (2013). Adolescents’ recognition of potential positive and negative outcomes in risky dating situations. Journal of interpersonal violence, 28(15), 3084-3106.

Herr, N. R., Hammen, C., & Brennan, P. A. (2007). Current and past depression as predictors of family functioning: A comparison of men and women in a community sample. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 694.

Jafarzadeh, Z. (2014). The effect of SYMBIS model on reducing marital conflicts in couples referring to the crisis intervention center in Isfahan. Master Thesis, Khorasgan Branch of Azad University. [In Persian].

Jomenia, S., Nazariy, A., Solimanian, A. (2021). Identifying the indicators of the problems of couples seeking a divorce in Torkaman city. Journal of Applied Family Therapy, 2(3), 191-166. [In Persian].

Kepler, A. (2015). Marital satisfaction: The impact of premarital and couples counseling. Master of Social Work Clinical Research Papers. St Catharine's College, Cambridge.

Lee, H. S., & Ok, S. W. (2002). Family of origin influences on anxiety, open communication, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Korean Home Economics Association English Edition, 3(1).

Marks, J. P. (2007). Christian premarital training in the local church setting: a study of the effectiveness of the SYMBIS model in reducing divorce and producing stable and satisfying martial relationships. Liberty Theological Seminary.

Miller, I. W., McDermut, W., Gordon, K. C., Keitner, G. I., Ryan, C. E., & Norman, W. (2000). Personality and family functioning in families of depressed patients. Journal of abnormal psychology, 109(3), 539.

Mirahmadi, L., Fatehi zade, M., Etemadi, O., Jazayeri, R.S, Pasandideh, A. (2019). Investigating the Effect of the SYMBIS-Based Training Model on Girls’ Marriage Expectations and Beliefs about mate selection. Journal of Family Research, 15(1), 7-24. [In Persian].

Moeti, B., Koloi-Keaikitse, S., & Mokgolodi, H. L. (2017). Married Women’s Lived Experiences on the Value of Traditional Premarital Counseling “Go Laya” on Marital Stability in Botswana. The Family Journal, 25(3), 247-256.

Mohammadi, M., Zahraka,r K., Jahangiri, J., Davarniya, R., Shakarami, M., Morshedi, M. (2017). Assessing the efficiency of educational intervention based on Gottman’s model on marital intimacy of women. Journal of health, 8(1), 74-84. [In Persian].

Moradi, M., Zeighami, R., Mohammadi, S., Sarichlu, M. E. (2013). Psychiatric status in couples attending training courses before marriage. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 1(3), 19-26. [In Persian].

Muraru, A. A., & Turliuc, M. N. (2012). Family-of-origin, romantic attachment, and marital adjustment: a path analysis model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 90-94.

Odero, M. E. A. (2019). Pre-marital counseling and its influence on marital quality among seventh day Adventist members in Kibra Division of Nairobi County, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation), Pan Africa Christian (PAC) University, Kenya.

Parrott, L., & Parrott, L. (2016). Saving your marriage before it starts (SYMBIS): Seven questions to ask beforehand after you marry. Publisher: Zondervan, 6-109.

Parrott, L., & Parrott, L. (2010). The Complete Guide to Marriage Mentoring. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan.

Parrott, L., & Parrott, L. L. (2006). Saving your marriage before it starts: Seven questions to ask before--and after--you marry. Zondervan.

Pashib, M., Seyyed Moharrami, I., mohammadi, S., Tatari, M. (2017). The effect of premarital Counseling on marriage expectation among students of university of Medical Sciences. Journal of Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, 4(4) :10-15. [In Persian].

Poley, J. M. (2011). A Pre-Marriage Proposal: Getting Ready for Marriage, an Adlerian Design. Master of Arts [dissertation]. [America]: Adlerian Counseling and Psychotherapy, 53.

Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical psychology review, 29(2), 105-115.

Riles G. (2016). Premarital vs. no premarital counseling: Determining marital satisfaction relationships in African American marriages. (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).

Rostami, M., Navabinejad, S., Farzad, V. (2019 a). The construction, reliability and validation of a questionnaire for assessing the patterns and premarital injuries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 13(3), 453-473. [In Persian].

Rostami, M., Navabinejad, S., Farzad, V. (2019 b). Pathology of couple’s problems in engagement: A qualitative study. Journal of Family Psychology, 6(1), 55-68. [In Persian].

Rostami, M., Navabinejad, S., Farzad, V. (2019 c). Pathology of couple's problems in engagement and creating a native premarital counseling package and comparing its effect with SYMBIS-based premarital education on problems engagement couples. PhD Thesis, Family Counseling, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, IRAN. [In Persian].

Rostami, M., Ghezelseflo, M. (2018). Examining the effects of the SYMBIS pre- marriage training on engaged couples' communication beliefs. Journal of Family Psychology, 5(1), 45-56. [In Persian].

Shahmoradi, S., Etemadi, O., Bahrami, F., Fatehi zade, M., Ahmadi, A. (2016). Modeling of effecting factors in demand- withdraw marital communicational cycle. Journal of Family Counseling & Psychotherapy, 6(1), 35- 56. [In Persian].

Simeone-DiFrancesco C., Roediger E., & Stevens B.A. (2015). Schema therapy with couples a practitioner’s guide to healing relationships. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Sagesse, W. (2018). Relationships between premarital counseling, religiosity, and marital satisfaction. Doctoral dissertation, Grand Canyon University.

Vail, S. H. (2016). Reducing the divorce rate among Christians in America: Premarital
counseling a prerequisite for marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(16),1179-1198

Westeros, K. (2002). Building healthy couple relationship: Do communication skills, gender, hope, and family types make a difference? Trinity western university. Canada.

Weiss, J. M. (2014). Marital preparation, experiences, and personal qualities in a qualitative study of individuals in great marriages.

دوفصلنامه روانشناسی خانواده

مقایسه اثربخشی آموزش پیش از ازدواج به شیوه گاتمن و مدل سیمبیس (SYMBIS) بر الگوها و آسیب‌های زوج‌های نامزد ترکمن

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 8، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 15
شهریور 1400
صفحه 47-64

مقایسه اثربخشی آموزش پیش از ازدواج به شیوه گاتمن و مدل سیمبیس (SYMBIS) بر الگوها و آسیب‌های زوج‌های نامزد ترکمن

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 8، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 15شهریور 1400صفحه 47-64

دوره 8، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 15
شهریور 1400
صفحه 47-64