مقایسه اثربخشی زوج‌درمانی گاتمن و زوج‌درمانی هیجان‌محور بر صمیمیت زناشویی زوجین

صائمی, حسین; بشارت, محمد علی; اصغرنژاد فرید, علی اصغر

نویسندگان

¹ واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران

² دانشگاه تهران

³ دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و خدمات بهداشتی درمانی ایران،

چکیده

صمیمیت در ازدواج برای داشتن ارتباطات زناشویی و خانوادگی محکم ضروری است. هدف پژوهش حاضر مقایسه اثربخشی زوج‌درمانی گاتمن و هیجان‌محور بر صمیمیت زناشویی زوجین بود. بدین منظور از بین زوجینی که سال 1396در شهر شاهرود به مراکز مشاوره آرامش، افق و خانواده مراجعه کردند، تعداد 36 زوج انتخاب و بر اساس نمره پایین‌تر از میانگین در سازگاری زناشویی (DAS) همتا شدند و به‌صورت تصادفی در دو گروه آزمایشی و یک گروه کنترل جایگزین و به پرسشنامه نیازهای صمیمیت باگاروزی (MINQ) در پیش‌آزمون و پس‌آزمون پاسخ دادند. یک گروه، 10 هفته زوج‌درمانی گاتمن و گروه دیگر 9 هفته زوج‌درمانی هیجان‌محور را دریافت نمودند، در حالی‌که گروه کنترل در لیست انتظار بودند. نتایج نشان داد که هر دو روش زوج‌درمانی گاتمن و هیجان‌محور بر صمیمیت زناشویی مؤثر است. همچنین بین دو گروه تفاوت معنادار وجود داشت. بدین‌صورت که گروه گاتمن در صمیمیت زناشویی موفق‌تر بودند. اگرچه تغییرات در همه مؤلفه‌های صمیمیت زناشویی در هر دو گروه آزمایش نسبت به گروه کنترل معنادار بود اما این تفاوت‌ها بین دو گروه آزمایش در 4 مؤلفه صمیمیت عاطفی، روانشناختی، جنسی، تفریحی- اجتماعی معنا‌دار بود. بر اساس یافته‌های این پژوهش، می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که زوج‌درمانی گاتمن در مقایسه با زوج‌درمانی هیجان‌محور بر صمیمیت زناشویی زوجین مؤثرتر است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The comparison of the effect of Gottman Couple Therapy and Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy on couplesâ marital intimacy

نویسندگان [English]

Hossein Saemi ¹
Mohammad Ali Besharat ²
Ali Asghar Asgharnejad Farid ³

چکیده [English]

Intimacy in marriage is essential for maintaining marital and family relationships. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of the Gottman Couple Therapy (GCT) and the Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy (EFCT) methods on marital intimacy. For this purpose, 36 couples were selected from among all couples referring to Aramesh, Ofogh, and Khanevadeh in Shahrood counseling centers in 2017. The subjects were matched based on having a score of Spanier (DAS) below average. They were then randomly assigned to two experimental and one control groups. Participants were asked to complete the marital intimacy Needs Questionnaire (Bagarozzi, 2001) in the pretest and posttest stages. Afterwards, one group received GCT for 10 weeks, and the other group was subjected to EFCT for 9 weeks, while the control group was on the waiting list. The results showed that both experimental groups showed improvements in Marital Intimacy than the control group. A significant difference was also found between the effectiveness of GCT and EFCT methods on Marital Intimacy in couples, so that the GCT group was more successful in Marital Intimacy. Although significant changes were observed in all components of marital intimacy in both experimental groups compared to the control group, the two experimental groups were significantly different in four components namely, Emotional, Psychological, Sexual, Physical and Recreational. Based on the results of the present study, it can be concluded that GCT couple therapy is more effective on couple's intimacy than the emotional couple therapy.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Gottman couple therapy
Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy
marital intimacy

مراجع

American Psychological Association. (2017). Marital education programs help keep couples together, research in action education. [Updated 2017/3/8; cited 2004 October 8]. Available from: http://www.apa.org/research/action/marital.aspx. Babcock, J., Gottman J. M., Ryan, K., & Gottman J. S. (2013). A component analysis of a brief psycho-educational couples' workshop: One-year follow-up results. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 252-280. Brand, C. (2012). An initial qualitative exploration of Gottman's couples research: A workshop from the participant's perspective. The Florida State University. New York: Basic Books. Broadwell, D., & Light, K. (2005). Hostility, conflict and cardiovascular response in married couple: A focuses on the dyad. Department of Health & Human Services, 12,142-152. Chen, Z., Tanak, N., Hiramura, H., & Shikai, N. (2007). The role of personalities in the martial adjustment of Japanese couples. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 557-561. Denton, W., Wittenberg, K., & Golden, R. (2012). Augmenting antidepressant medication treatment of depressed women with emotionally focused therapy for couples: a randomized pilot study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38, 23-38. Dole, C., & Schroeder, G. (2001). The impact of various factors on the personality, job satisfaction and turnover intentions of professional accountants. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16, 234 -245. Goldman, A., & Greenberg, L. (1992). Comparison of integrated systemic and emotionally focused approaches to couple’s therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 962-969. Gottman J. M., Gottman, J. S., & DeClaire, J. (2006). Ten lessons to transform your marriage. New York: Crown Publishers. Gottman, J. S., & Gottman, J. M. (2015). 10 principles for doing couples therapy. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company. Gottman, J., & Gottman, J. (2017). The natural principles of love. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9, 7–26. Greenberg, L. S., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). Different effects of experiential and problem-solving interventions in resolving marital conflict. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 63, 67-79. Greenberg, L., Warwar, S., & Malcolm, W. (2010). Emotion-focused couples therapy and the facilitation of forgiveness. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 36, 28–42. Gurman, A. S. (2008). Clinical handbook of couple therapy. New York: The Guilford Press. James, P. (1991). Effects of a communication training component added to an emotionally focused couples therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 17, 263-276. Johnson, M., & Talitman, E. (1997). Predictors of success in emotionally focused couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23, 135-152. Johnson, M., Moser, M., Beckes, L., Smith, A., Dalgleish, T., Halchuk, R., et al, Coan, A. (2013). Soothing the threatened brain: Leveraging contact comfort with emotionally focused therapy. Published online 2013 Nov 20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079314 . Johnson, S., & Wittenborn, A. (2012). New research findings on emotionally focused therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 3, 18-22. Labrecque, T., & Whisman, M. (2019). Extramarital sex and marital dissolution: Does identity of the extramarital partner matter? Journal of Family Process, 9, 271-287. MacPhee, D. C., Johnson, S. M., & VanderVeer, M. C. (1995). Low sexual desire in women: The effects of marital therapy. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 21, 159-182. Marguerite, K., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Boislard, M. (2012). Identity, intimacy, status and sex dating goals as correlates of goal-consistent behavior and satisfaction in Australian youth. Journal of Adolescence, 3, 1–14. Martin, J. L., & Ashby, J. S. (2004). Perfectionism and fear of intimacy: Implications for relationship. Journal of Family Therapy, 12, 368-374. Mckinan, J. M. (2013). Reveating vulnerable emotion in couple therapy: Impact on session outcome. Journal of Family Therapy; 35, 303-319. Naaman, S., Pappas, J. D., Makinen, J., Zuccarini, D., & Johnson, S. D. (2005). Attachment injured couples with emotionally focused therapy. A Case Study Approach. Psychiatry, 68, 55-77. Olson, D. H., & Defrain, J. (2006). Marriages & family’s intimacy, diversity and strengths (5th Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill. Palmer-Olsen, L., Gold, L. L., & Woolley, S. R. (2011). Supervising emotionally focused therapists: A systematic research-based model. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37, 411-426. Patrick, S., Sells, J. N., Giordano, F. G., & Tollerud, T. R. (2007). Intimacy, differentiation, and personality variables as predictors of marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Therapy, 15, 359-367. Robinson, P. B., & Sexton, E. A. (2005). The effect of education and experience on self-employment success. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 141-156. Shapiro, A. F., Gottman, J., & Fink, B. C. (2015). Short – term change in couples’ conflict following a transition to parenthood intervention. Couple and Family Psychology Research and Practice, 4, 239-251. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28. Tracy, L., & Susan, M., & Stephanie, A., & Wiebe Giorgio, A. (2014). Predicting change in marital satisfaction throughout emotionally focused couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 41, 276-291. Weeks, N., Gerald, R., Fife, B., & Stephan, T. (2009) Rebuilding intimacy following in idently. Psychotherapy in Australia, 15, 207-216. Welch, S., Lachmar, E., & Wittenborn, K. (2019). Establishing safety in emotionally focused couple therapy: A single‐case process study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 45, 402-415. Westeros, K. (2002). Building healthy couple relationship: Do communication skills, gender, hope, and family types make a difference? New York: Taylor and Francis group, LLC. Wittenborn, K., Ridenour, A., MitchellRyan, A., & Seedall, B. (2018) Randomized controlled trial of emotionally focused couple therapy compared to treatment as usual for depression: Outcomes and mechanisms of change. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 45, 395-409. Yelsma, P., & Sherilyn, M. (2003). An examination of couple's difficulties with emotional expressiveness and their marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Communication, 3, 41-62.

دوفصلنامه روانشناسی خانواده

مقایسه اثربخشی زوج‌درمانی گاتمن و زوج‌درمانی هیجان‌محور بر صمیمیت زناشویی زوجین

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 5، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 10
10
اسفند 1397
صفحه 39-52

مقایسه اثربخشی زوج‌درمانی گاتمن و زوج‌درمانی هیجان‌محور بر صمیمیت زناشویی زوجین

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 5، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 1010اسفند 1397صفحه 39-52

دوره 5، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 10
10
اسفند 1397
صفحه 39-52