نشریه انجمن علمی روانشناسی ایران

نویسندگان

دانشگاه خوارزمی

چکیده

چکیده: در بسیاری از زوجین احساسات مثبت اولیه در گذر زمان کاهش می‌یابد و تعارضات شدید جایگزین آن می‌شود. استفاده از سبک‌های مخرب حل تعارض صرفا باعث دوری بیشتر زوج‌ها می‌شود و توانایی زوج‌ها در کاربرد مهارت‌های حل مساله می‌تواند عاملی برای بهبود روابط زوجین باشد. هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین اثربخشی مدل گشتاوری السون بر تاب‌آوری و تعارضات زناشویی زوجین بود. پژوهش حاضر، آزمایشی از نوع پیش‌آزمون- پس‌آزمون - پیگیری با گروه کنترل بود. تعداد 20 زوج در این پژوهش شرکت کردند که در دو گروه آزمایش و کنترل قرار گرفتند. سپس گروه آزمایش طی 8 جلسه120-90 دقیقه‌ای هفته‌ای یک‌بار تحت تاثیر مداخله (مدل گشتاوری السون) قرار گرفتند. ابزار مورد استفاده در این پژوهش مقیاس تاب‌آوری (CD-RISC) و پرسشنامه تعارضات زناشویی (MCQ) بود. یافته‌ها نشان داد که بین میانگین نمرات پیش‌آزمون و پس‌آزمون گروه آزمایش و کنترل در تاب‌آوری و تعارضات زناشویی تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد؛ آموزش مدل گشتاوری السون موجب افزایش تاب‌آوری و کاهش تعارضات زناشویی زوجین شده است و این تاثیر در طی زمان دارای ماندگاری اثر است. با توجه به یافته‌های به‌دست‌آمده از پژوهش حاضر می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که الگوی گشتاوری السون می‌تواند به‌عنوان یک روش درمانی مناسب مورداستفاده متخصصان و درمانگران خانواده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effectiveness of Olson Circumplex Model in couples, resilency and marital conflicts

نویسندگان [English]

  • Nazak Hosseini Hajibekandeh
  • Shokouh Navabinejad
  • Alireza kiamanesh

چکیده [English]

Abstract: In many couples, the primary positive feelings are decreased by passing time and are replaced with acute conflicts. Using destructive conflict resolution styles increases the distance between the couples, while their ability to apply problem solving skills can be a factor to improve the couples’ relationships. The present study was conducted aiming at determining the effectiveness of Olson Circumference Model in the couples’ resiliency and marital conflicts. The present study was an experimental research of pretest-posttest type with a control group. Participants of the study were 20 couples assigned to the experimental and the control groups. The experimental group was then influenced by the Olson Circumplex Model during eight (90-120 minutes) instruction held once a week. The instruments of the study were Resiliency Scale (CD-RISC) and Marital Conflict Questionnaire (MCQ). The results demonstrated that there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental group in resiliency and marital conflicts. It can be concluded that training in the Olson Circumplex Model has increased resiliency and decreased marital conflict in couples and this effect was durable over the time. Considering the findings of the present research, it can also be concluded that the Olson Circumplex Model can be used by specialists and family therapists.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Olson Circumference Model
  • Resiliency
  • marital conflict
Adebayo, S.O., & Oganlaye, A.J. (2010). Influence of Family Chohesion on Intimet Relationshiips of a Nigerian Undergraduate Sample. European Journal of Scientific Research, 41, 551-558. Bodenman, G., Revenson,T,A. (Ed)., & Kaysar, K. (Ed). (2005). Dyadic Coping & Its Significance for Marital Functioning.Couples coping with stress. Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping. Decade of behavior. Washington: American Psychological Association. Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience. Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59,20-28. Chan, J.G. (2003). An examination of family- involved approaches to alcolism treatment. The Family Journal, 11, 129-138. Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor Davidson resilience scale(CD-RISC). Depression & anxiety Journal, 18, 76-82. Curtis, W. J., & Cicchetti, D. (2007). Emotionand resilience: A multilevel investigation of Hemispheric electroencephalogram asymmetry and emotion regulation in maltreated and nonmaltreated children. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 811-840. Dillon, H.N. (2005). Family Violence and Divorce: Effects on Marriage Expectations. Electronic Theses and Dissertations; East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2004).positive emotion trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psycho sci, 13, 172-175. Graham, J. M., & conoly, C. W. (2006). The role of marital attributions in the relationship between life stressors & marital quality.Personal relationships, 13, 231-241. Greeff, A. P., & Vanderson, M. S. (2004). Variables associated with resilience in divorced families. Social indicators research, 68, 59-75. http://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2155&context=etd. Huber, C.H., Navarro, R.L., Womble, M.W., & Mume, F.L. (2010). Family resilience and mid lif marital satisfaction. The Family Journal, 18, 136-145. Lataillade, J. J. (2006). Consideration for treatment of African American couples relationships. Journal of cognitive psychotherapy: an international quarterly, 20, 341-358. Lingren, H.G. (2003). Creating sustainable families [on-line]. Available: http:www.iar. UN.Edu/pubs/family/g1269.htm Meredith, D., & Meredith, S. (2003). Five keys of resolving marital conflict, Christian Family Life. NY: Roufledge. Neff,L.A., & Bradly, E.F. (2011). Stress resilience in early marriage: can practice make perfect? Journal of Personality & social psychology, 98, 1-18. Olson, D.H. (2009). Face IV and the Ciromplex model: validation study. Journal of marital and family therapy, dio: 10.1111/j.1752-0606. 2009.00175.x. Olson,D.H. (1998). Circumplex model of marital & family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 65, 160-185. Vandeleur, C.L., Jeanpretre, N., Perrez, M., & Schoebi, D. (2009). Cohesion, satisfaction eith family bonds, and emotional well-being in families with adolescents. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1205-1219. Walsh, F. (1996). The concept of family resilience: Crisis and challenge. Family Process, 35, 261-281. Walsh, F. (2003). A family resilience framework: Innovative practice applications. Family Relations, 51, 2 - 18.