دوفصلنامه روانشناسی خانواده

نشریه انجمن علمی روانشناسی ایران

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اخبار و اعلانات

اشتراک نشریه

راهنمای تنظیم مقاله

شرایط و ضوابط ارسال مقاله

فرم های نشریه

هزینه های بررسی مقاله

ارسال مقاله

داوران

راهنمای پابلونز برای داوران

سبک‌های دلبستگی، اِسناد علّی و اِسناد مسوولیت به عنوان پیش‌بین‌های خشونت علیه‌ زنان

نویسندگان

دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

چکیده

: هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی رابطه سبک­های دلبستگی (اضطرابی و اجتنابی) و اِسناد­های ارتباطی (اِسناد علّی و اِسناد مسوولیت) با خشونت علیه زنان بود. 130 زن خشوت­دیده مراجعه­کننده به اورژانس اجتماعی شهر شیراز به پرسشنامه تجدید نظر شده تجارب در روابط نزدیک (ECR-R)، مقیاس اِسنادهای ارتباطی (RAM) و پرسشنامه خشونت نسبت به زنان (VTWI) پاسخ دادند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که بین هر یک از متغیرهای پیش­بین دلبستگی اضطرابی، دلبستگی اجتنابی، اِسناد علّی و اِسناد مسوولیت، با خشونت­دیدگی زنان رابطه مثبت و معنادار وجود دارد. همچنین نتیجه تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه نشان داد که متغیرهای پیش­­بین دلبستگی اضطرابی، دلبستگی اجتنابی، اِسناد علّی و اِسناد مسوولیت، بخشی از واریانس خشونت علیه زنان را تبیین می­کنند. بر اساس یافته­های این پژوهش، می­توان نتیجه گرفت که ترس فراگیر از طرد شدن و وابستگی بیش از حد به همسر در افراد اضطرابی، گریزان بودن از صمیمت و دوری­گزینی از شوهر در افراد اجتنابی، تمرکز بیش از حد به رفتارهای منفی همسر در زنان با اِسنادهای علّی و همچنین به دنبال مقصر بودن و سرزنش کردن همسر در زنان با اِسنادهای مسوولیت می­تواند زمینه­های خشونت علیه زنان را به وجود آورد.  نتایج پژوهش حاضر می­تواند به درمانگران جهت شناسایی عوامل موثر در  زمینه­ی خشونت علیه زنان کمک کند. همچنین نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که به وجود آمدن خشونت علیه زنان فقط محدود به نقش مردان نمی­شود، بلکه زنان و ویژگی­های ارتباطی آنها نقش بسیاری در ایجاد این معضل دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Attachment styles, causal attribution and responsibility attribution as predictors of violence against women

نویسندگان [English]

  • Reza Khojasteh Mehr
  • Abbas Amanelahi
  • Esmail Zohrei
  • Gholamreza Rajabi

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship of attachment styles (anxiety and avoidance), relational attributions (causal and responsibility attributions) with violence against women. From among all the female violence victims referring to the social security center of Shiraz 130 women were selected through convenient sampling method. They completed the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised Questionnaire (ECR-R), the Relationship Attribution Measure (RAM) and Violence Toward Women Inventory (VTWI). The data were analyzed using simple correlation and multiple regression. The results revealed a significantly positive correlation between anxiety and avoidance attachments, causal and responsibility Attributions and the violence exercised against women. The results of multiple regression also showed that anxiety and avoidance attachments, causal and responsibility attributions explained 64 percent of the total variance in the violence exercised against women. According to the results, it can be said that a pervasive fear of being rejected and an excessive dependence on a partner in anxious people, getting evasive about intimacy and avoiding husband in avoidant people, an excessive concentration on the negative behavior of the partner by the women with causal attributions, and seeking for blaming partner by the women with responsibility attributions can bring about violence against women. The results of the current study can help the therapists to diagnose the effective factors in violence against women. The results also showed that violence against women is not merely confined to men’s role, but women and their relational characteristics play an influential role in this disorder.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • attachment styles
  • Attribution
  • Violence against women
مراجع
Aubrey, A. A. (2010). The role of attachment in the intergeneration transmission of abuse: From childhood victimization to adult re-victimization and distress. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of North Texas. Bond, S. B., & Bond, M. (2004). Attachment styles and violence within couples. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 192, 857-863. Bookwala, j. (2002). The role of own and perceived partner attachment in relationship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 84-100. Burnette, J., Davis, D. E., Green, J. D., Worthington, E., & Bradfield, E. (2009). Insecure attachment and depressive symptoms; the mediating role of rumination empathy, and forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 276-280. Cassidy, J., & Berlin, L. J. (1994). The insecure ambivalent pattern of attachment: Theory and research. Child Development, 65, 971-991. Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. (1999). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications. New York: Guilford Press. Doumas, M. D., Pearson, C. L., Elgin, J. E., & McKinley, L. L. (2008). Adult attachment as a risk factor for intimate partner violence: The “mispairing” of partners’ attachment styles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 616-634. Dutton, D. G., Saunders, K., Starzomski, A., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Intimacy-anger and insecure attachment as precursors of abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1367-1386. Fincham, F. D., & Hall, J. H. (2006). The roles of attribution and forgiveness. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 25, 508-522. Fincham, F. D., Paleari, G., & Regalia, C. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: The role of relationship quality, attributions, and empathy. Personal Relationships, 9, 27-37. Graham, J. M., & Conoley, C. W. (2006). The role of marital attributions in the relationship between life stressors and marital quality. Journal of Personal Relationships, 13, 231-241. Halat, M. I., & Hovardaoglu, S. (2010). The relation between the attachment styles, causality and responsibility attributions and lone lines of married couples in the context of the investment model. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 2332-2337. Henderson, A. J. Z., Bartholomew, K., Trinke, S. J., & Kwong, M. J. (2005). When loving means hurting: An exploration of attachment and intimate abuse in a community sample. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 219-230. Higginbotham, B. J., Ketring, S. A., Hibbert, J., Wright, D. W., & Guarino, A. (2007). Relationship religiosity, adult attachment style, and courtship violence experienced by females. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 55-62. Hilt, L. M. (2004). Attribution retraining for therapeutic change: theory, practice, and future directions. Imagination Cognition and Personality, 23, 289–307. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2000). Attributions in marriage: State or trait? A growth curve analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 295-309. Kayzer, K. (1990). The process of marital dissatisfaction: Interventions at various stages. Journal of Family Relations, 39, 257-265. Kesner, J. E., & McKenry, P. C. (1998). The role of childhood attachment factors in predicting male violence toward female intimates. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 417-432. Marchand, J, F. (2004). Husbands’ and wives’ marital quality: The role of adult attachment orientations, depressive symptoms, and conflict resolution behaviors. Journal of Attachment & Human Development, 1, 99-112. McNulty, J. K., & Karney, B. R. (2001). Attributions in marriage: Integrating specific and global evaluations of a relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 943-955. Mikulincer, M. (1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1209-1224. Moore, S., & Leung, C. (2002). Young people’s romantic attachment styles and their associations with well-being. Journal of Adolescence, 25, 243–255. O’Hearn, R. E., & Davis, K. E. (1997). Women’s experience of giving and receiving emotional abuse: An attachment perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 375–391. Stein, M. L., & Miller, A. K. (2012). Distress resulting from perceivers’ own intimate partner violence experiences predicts culpability attributions toward a battered woman on trial for killing her abuser: A path model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2527-2544. Tremblay, N., Wright, J., Mamodhoussen, S., McDuff, P., & Cote, G. (2008). Correlates of attributions of causality and responsibility for couples in consultation for marital therapy. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 40, 162-170. Vachher, A. S., & Sharma, A. (2010). Domestic violence against women and their mental health status in a colony in Delhi. Indian journal of community medicine, 35, 403-405. Wallach, H., & Sela, T. (2008). The importance of male batters attributions in understanding and preventing domestic violence. Journal of family violence, 23, 655-660. Wearden, A., Peters, I., Berry, K., Barrowclough, C., & Liversidge, T. (2008). Adult attachment, parenting experiences, and core beliefs about self and others. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1246-1257. Weiss, J. A., MacMullin, J., Waechter, R., & Wekerle, C. (2011). Child maltreatment, adolescent attachment style and dating violence: Considerations in youths with borderline-to-mild intellectual disability. Infant Mental Health Journal, 9, 555-576. Yusmarhaini, Y., John, S. W. (2013). A survey of family therapists’ adult attachment styles in the United Kingdom. Journal of Contemporary Family Therapy, 12, 132-146.
دوفصلنامه روانشناسی خانواده
دوره 1، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 1
1
شهریور 1393
صفحه 41-52
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار