نشریه انجمن علمی روانشناسی ایران

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد مسجدسلیمان

2 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اهواز

چکیده

سازگاری زناشویی از مهم‌ترین شاخص‌های کیفیت رابطه زناشویی است. پژوهش‌های متعددی به نقش استانداردهای زناشویی و اِسنادهای ارتباطی در پیش‌بینی وضعیت زناشویی زوجین پرداخته است. هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین نقش ابعاد استانداردهای زناشویی و اِسنادهای ارتباطی در پیش‌بینی سازگاری و ناسازگاری زناشویی زنان متأهل بود. نمونه‌ای شامل 324 زن متأهل (150زن ناسازگار و 174 زن سازگار) در پژوهش حاضر شرکت داشتند. از شرکت‌کنندگان درخواست شد پرسشنامه استانداردهای روابط خاص (ISRS) و مقیاس اِسناد ارتباطی (RAM) را تکمیل کنند. نتایج به‌دست آمده، فرضیه پژوهش مبنی بر پیش‌بینی سازگاری و ناسازگاری زناشویی زنان بر اساس استانداردهای زناشویی (مرزهای شخصی، پیامد کنترل و سرمایه‌گذاری ابزاری و عاطفی) و اِسنادهای ارتباطی (جایگاه مهار، ثبات و پایداری، عمومیت، قصد و نیت، انگیزه و سرزنش) را تأیید کرد. همچنین، نتایج تحلیل تمیز با روش گام‌به‌گام نشان داد که متغیرهای اِسناد انگیزه، استاندارد سرمایه‌گذاری عاطفی و اِسناد جایگاه مهار، قوی‌ترین پیش‌بین‌های سازگاری و ناسازگاری روابط زناشویی هستند. بر اساس یافته‌های به‌دست آمده می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که استانداردهای زناشویی و اِسنادهای ارتباطی نقش مهمی در سازگاری زناشویی زنان دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Marital standards and relationship attributions as predictors of women's marital adjustment and non-adjustment

نویسندگان [English]

  • Masoud Shahbazi 1
  • Amin Koraei 2
  • Nahid Kianijam 1

1

2

چکیده [English]

Marital adjustment is one of the most important indicators of women's marital quality. Several studies have investigated the role of marital standards and relationship attributions in predicting marital quality in married couples. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of the dimensions of marital standards and relationship attributions in predicting adjustment/ non-adjustment among married women. A sample of 324 married women (150 non-adjusted and 174 adjusted) was selected from all married women in Ahvaz. Participants completed the Inventory of Specific Relationship Standards (ISRS) and the Relationship Attributions Measure (RAM). . Results obtained from Enter Discriminant analysis revealed that adjustment or non-adjustment in marital relationship can be predicted by the variables of marital standards (personal boundaries, control outcome, instrumental and expressive investment) and relationship attributions (locus of control, stability, globality, intent, motivation and blame). Also, Stepwise Discriminant analysis of the data indicated that motivation attribution, expressive investment standard and locus of control attribution are the strongest predictors of adjustment/non-adjustment in marital relationships. Based on the findings, it can be concluded that marital standards and relationship attributions play a significant role in women’s marital adjustment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • marital standards
  • relationships attributions
  • marital adjustment or non-adjustment
  • Married women
Alexander, A. L. (2008). Relationship resources for coping with unfulfilled standards in dating relationship: Commitment, satisfaction, and closeness. Journal of Social and Personality Relationship, 25, 725-747. Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., & LaTaillade, J. J. (2002). Cognitive-behavioral couple therapy. In A. S. Gurman & N. S. Jacobson (Eds.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (pp. 26–58). New York: Guilford Press. Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Daiuto, A. D., Carels, R. A., Rankin, L. A., & Burnett, C. K. (1996). Cognitions in marriage: The relationship between standards and attributions. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 209–222. Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Rankin, L. A., & Burnett, C. K. (1996). Assessing relationship standards: The Inventory of Specific Relationship Standards. Journal of Family Psychology, 10, 72–88. Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Sayers, S. L., & Sher, T. G. (1989). The role of cognitions in marital relationships: Definitional, methodological, and conceptual issues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 31–38. Baucom, D. H., Sayers, S. L. & Duher, A. (1987). "Attributional style and attributional patterns among married couples." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 596-607. Blais, R. K., & Renshaw, K. D. (2014). Perceptions of partners' attributions for depression in relation to perceptions of support and conflict in romantic relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 40, 498-508. Bodenmann, G. & Cina, A. (2000). Der einfluss von stress auf die partnerschaftsqualität und -stabilität. Kontext, 31, 124-138. Bradbury, T. N. & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions in marriage: Review and Critique. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3-33. Brandt, C. G., Dean, M. B., Brandon, K. B., & Sarah, E. L. (2011). Getting to the root of relationship attributions: Family of origin perspective on self and partner views. Contemporary Family Therapy, 33, 253–272. Chi, P., Epstein, N. B., Fang, X., Lam, D. O. B., & Li, X. (2013). Similarity of relationship standards, couple communication patterns, and marital satisfaction among Chinese couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 806-816. Cropley, C. J., & Reid, S. A. (2008). A latent variable analysis of couple closeness, attributions, and relational satisfaction. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 16, 364–374. Epstein, N, & Baucom, D. H. (2002). Enhanced cognitive – behavioral therapy for couples: A contextual approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Epstein, N. B, Chen, F., & Beyder- Kamjou, I. (2005). Relationship standards and marital satisfaction in Chinese and American couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 59 – 74. Fincham, F. D. & Beach, S. R. (1999). Marital conflict: Implications for working couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 47 - 77. Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1992). Assessing attribution in marriage: The relationship attribution measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 449-452. Fincham, F. D., Harold, G. T., & Gano-Phillips, S. (2000). The longitudinal association between attributions and marital satisfaction: Direction of effects and role of efficacy expectations. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 267-285. Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). “Timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple Will divorce over a 14-year period”. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 737-745. Graham, J. M. & Conoley, C. W. (2006). The role of marital attributions in the relationship between life stressors and marital quality. Journal of Personal Relationships, 13, 231-241. Halat, M, I., & Hovardaoglu, S. (2010). The relations between the attachment styles, causality and responsibility attributions and loneliness of the married couples in the context of the investment model. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 2332–2337. Heyman, R. E. (2001). Observation of couple conflicts clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations. Psychological Assessment, 13, 5-35. Hilt, L. M. (2004). Attribution retraining for therapeutic change: Theory, practice, and future directions. Journal of Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 23, 289–307. Holmes, B. M., & Johnson, K. R. (2009). Where fantasy meets reality: Media exposure, relationship bellife and standard, and the moderating effect of a current relationship. In E. P. Lamont (Ed.). Social Psychology: New research (pp. 89–108). New York: Nova Science Publishers. Kepler, A. (2015). Marital Satisfaction: The impact of premarital and couples counseling. A master of arts thesis in social work, St. Catherine University and the University of St Thomas, Minnesota. Kimmes, J. G., & Durtschi, J. A. (2016). Forgiveness in romantic relationships: The roles of attachment, empathy, and attributions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42, 565–759. Kimmes, J. G., Durtschi, J. A., Clifford, C. E., Knapp, D. J., & Fincham, F. D. (2015). The role of pessimistic attributions in the association between anxious attachment and relationship satisfaction. Family Relations, 64, 547–562. Kohen, C. S. & Sayers, S. L. (2005). Extreme relationship standards in the context of discordant and nondiscordant couples. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 12, 319 – 323. Litzinger, S., & Gordon, K. C. (2005). Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 31, 409-424. McNulty, J. K. (2016). Should spouses be demanding less from marriage? A contextual perspective on the implications of interpersonal standards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 444-457. Rao, S. L. (2017). Marital adjustment and depression among couples. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4, 34-42. Slatcher, R. B., & Schoebi, D. (2017). Protectie processes underlying the link between marital quality and physical health. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 148-152. Stander, V. A., Hsiung, P., & McDermid, S. (2009). The relationship of attribution to marital distress: A comparison of mainland Chinese and U.S couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 124-134. Stander, V. A., Hsiung, P., & McDermid, S. (2009).The relationship of attribution to maritaldistress: Acomparison of mainland Chinese and U.S couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 15,124-134. Tremblay, N., Wright, J., Mamodhoussen, S., McDuff, P., & Cote, G. (2008). Correlates of attributions of causality and responsibility for couples in consultation for marital therapy. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 40, 162-170. Wunderer, E., & Schneewind, K. A. (2008). The relationship between marital standards, dyadic coping and marital satisfaction. Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 462-476.