نشریه انجمن علمی روانشناسی ایران

نویسندگان

دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

چکیده

خانواده به عنوان نخستین و مهم­ترین عامل رشد، تاثیر عمده‌ای بر سلامت روانی کودک از یک­سو و آسیب‌های روانی او از سوی دیگر دارد. شواهد نظری حاکی از ان است که ایمنی هیجانی می­تواند در تاثیر خانواده بر مشکلات رفتاری نقش واسطه­ای ایفا نماید. هدف از پژوهش حاضر تعیین نقش واسطه­ای ایمنی هیجانی بر رابطه بین کارکرد خانواده با مشکلات رفتاری کودکان بود. نمونه این پژوهش شامل 262 نفر (117 دختر، 145پسر) از دانش­آموزان دبستانی شهر تهران بودند که به مقیاس­های ایمنی در سیستم خانواده (ESS)، ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﺵﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻭ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﮕﻲ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ (FACES-III) و پرسشنامه توانایی­ها و مشکلات (SDQ) پاسخ دادند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که دو بعد کارکرد خانواده یعنی پیوستگی و سازش‌پذیری با تمامی مولفه‌های ایمنی هیجانی مرتبط است و هر سه بعد ایمنی هیجانی در رابطه ایمنی هیجانی و کارکرد خانواده نقش واسطه‌ای ایفا می‌کند. در واقع کارکرد موثر خانواده باعث افزایش ایمنی و کاهش مشغله ذهنی و کناره‌گیری در کودکان می‌شود. هم­چنین کارکرد خانواده با افزایش ایمنی و کاهش ناایمنی باعث کاهش مشکلات رفتاری در کودکان می‌گردد. با توجه به نتایج این مطالعه به­منظور طراحی یک مدل مناسب برای پیشگیری از بروز مشکلات بهتر است به آموزش کارکردهای اصلی خانواده و اثرات آن بر ایمنی هیجانی کودکان مبادرت گردد و آگاهی‌های لازم در قالبی مناسب و جذاب به والدین و کودکان ارایه شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Mediating role of emotional security in relationship between family functioning and child’s behavioral problems

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Poursina
  • Karineh Tahmasian
  • Mansoureh Sadat Sadeghi

چکیده [English]

The family as the first and most important factor in child development has a major impact on the child's mental health and psychological problems. Evidences suggest that emotional security has a mediating role in the relationship between family functioning and child’s behavioral problems. The purpose of this study was to determine the mediatory role of child’s emotional security in the relations between family functioning and children’s behavioral problems. The sample consisted of 262 fifth and sixth graders of Tehran (117 girls and 145 boys) and their mothers who were selected according to cluster sampling method. The students completed the Security on Family Scale (SFS), the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES-III), and the mothers completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Results of the analysis showed that both dimension of family functioning (cohesion and adaptability) correlated with all emotional security dimensions, and they also could play a mediatory role in relation between family functioning and child’s behavioral problems. In fact, effective functioning of the family increases security and decreases preoccupation and disengagement. Through increasing security and decreasing insecurity family functioning can reduce child’s behavioral problems. With respect to the results of this study, teaching the basic functions of the family and their effects on children's emotional security seems useful in preventing problems between children and parents. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • emotional security
  • Family functioning
  • child’s behavioral problem
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Bowen, M. (1978) .Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Aronson. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). The bioecological model from a life course perspective: Reflections of a participant observer. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder & K. Luscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp.599-618). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Cummings, E., Schermerhorn, A., Davies, P., Goeke-Morey, M., & Cummings, E. (2006). Interparental discord and child adjustment: Prospective investigations of emotional security as an explanatory mechanism. Child Development, 77, 132-152. Cummings, E., George, M., McCoy, K., & Davies, P. (2012). Interparental conflict in kindergarten and adolescent adjustment: Prospective investigation of emotional security as an explanatory mechanism. Child Development, 83, 1703-1715. Davies, P., & Cummings, E. (1994). Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 387-411. Davies, P., Cummings, E., & Winter, M. (2004). Pathways between profiles of family functioning, child security in the interparental system, and child psychological problems. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 525-550. Davies, P., Harold, G., Goeke-Morey, M., Cummings, E., Shelton, K., Rasi, J., et al. (2002). Child Emotional Security and Interparental Conflict. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67, 1-27. Davies, P., Sturge-Apple, M., Cicchetti, D., & Cummings, E. (2007). The role of child adrenocortical functioning in pathways between forms of interparental conflict and child maladjustment. Developmental Psychology, 43, 918-930. Davies, P., & Cummings, E. (2005). Children’s perceived agency in the context of marital conflict: Relations with marital conflict over time. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51, 121-144. Feeney, J., Noller, P., & Hanrahan, M. (1994.( Assessing adult attachment. In M. B. Sperlig & W. H. Berman (Eds.), Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspective (pp.128-152). New York: Guilford Press. Forman, E., & Davies, P. (2005). Assessing children’s appraisals of security in the family system: The development of the Security in the Family System (SIFS) scales. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 900-916. Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581-586. Goodman, R., Ford, T., Simmons, H., & Gatward, R. (2000) .Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample.British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 534-539. Grych, F., & Fincham, D. (1990). Interparental conflict and child development: Theory, research, and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press. Grych, J., Harold, G., & Miles, C. (2003) .A prospective investigation of appraisals as mediators of the link between interparental conflict and child adjustment .Child Development, 74, 1176-1193. Harold, G. T., Shelton, M. C., Goek-Morey, E., & Cummings, M. (2004). Marital conflict, child emotional security about family relationships and child adjustment. Social Development, 13, 350-376. Kapanee, A., & Rao, K. (2007). Attachment style in relation to family functioning and distress in college students. Journal of Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 33, 15-21. Lindahl, K., Bregman, H., & Malik, N. (2012). Family boundary structures and child adjustment: The indirect role of emotional reactivity. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 839-847. Mash, E., & Wolfe, D. (2010). Abnormal child psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. Olson, D. H., Portner, J. Y., & Lavee, Y. (1985). FACES III. MN: University of Minnesota. Shek, D. (2002). Family functioning and psychological well-being, school adjustment and problem behavior in Chinese adolescents with and without economic disadvantage. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163, 497-502. Shelton, K., & Harold, G. (2008). Interparental conflict, negative parenting, and children's adjustment: Bridging links between parents' depression and children's psychological distress. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 712-724. Vandvik, I., & Eckblad, G. (1993). FACES III and the Kvebaek Family Sculpture Technique as measures of cohesion and closeness. Family Process, 32, 221-233.