نشریه انجمن علمی روانشناسی ایران

نویسندگان

دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی

چکیده

دلزدگی زناشویی به عنوان یکی از عامل‌های اساسی طلاق در ادبیات پژوهشی مطرح است که تحت تاثیر عوامل مختلفی از جمله نورزگرایی، عملکرد خانواده اصلی، باورهای ارتباطی و الگوهای تعاملی زوجین قرار دارد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارزیابی اثرات مستقیم و غیر‌مستقیم آسیب‌پذیری‌های بادوام یعنی نورزگرایی، عملکرد خانواده اصلی و باورهای ارتباطی زوجین از طریق الگوهای تعاملی زوجین بر دلزدگی زناشویی زوجین متقاضی طلاق انجام شد. 100 زوج متقاضی طلاق در شهرستان اردبیل به پرسشنامه‌های دلزدگی زناشویی (CBM)، زیرمقیاس نورزگرایی از پرسشنامه شخصیتی نئو (NEO-FFI)، مقیاس خانواده اصلی (FOS)، پرسشنامه باورهای ارتباطی (RBI) و فرم کوتاه پرسشنامه الگوهای ارتباطی  (CPQ-SFپاسخ دادند. تحلیل داده‌ها نشان داد که مسیرهای مستقیم نورزگرایی، باورهای ارتباطی زوجین، الگوهای تعاملی توقع/ کناره‌گیری و مثبت به دلزدگی زناشویی معنادار بودند. به علاوه مسیرهای مستقیم نورزگرایی و باورهای ارتباطی زوجین به سبک توقع/کناره­گیری، و هم­چنین عملکرد خانواده اصلی و باورهای ارتباطی زوجین به سبک مثبت معنادار بودند. از سوی دیگر، طبق نتایج پژوهش، رابطه غیرمستقیم نورزگرایی و باورهای ارتباطی با دلزدگی زناشویی از طریق سبک توقع/کناره­گیری و رابطه غیرمستقیم عملکرد خانواده اصلی و باورهای ارتباطی با دلزدگی زناشویی از طریق سبک مثبت معنادار به دست آمدند. بر اساس نتایج پژوهش به نظر می‌رسد که آسیب‌پذیری‌های بادوام زوجین به تنهایی یا به همراه سبک‌های تعاملی زوجین می‌تواند در دلزدگی زناشویی در طول زندگی نقش داشته باشد. این یافته می‌تواند در فرایند مشاوره پیش از ازدواج و درمان زناشویی به متخصصان مربوطه یاری رساند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The mediating role of Couple communication patterns in the relationship between Enduring vulnerabilities and marital burnout in the divorce- seeking couples

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Narimani
  • Asghar Pouresmali
  • Niloofar Mikaeili
  • Nader Hajloo

چکیده [English]

Marital burnout is a consistently observed essential factor for divorce in most literature and is influenced by many factors including neuroticism, family of origin, relationship beliefs and couple communication patterns. This study was carried out to investigate the direct and indirect effects of enduring vulnerabilities (neuroticism, family of origin, relationship beliefs) by communication patterns in marital burnout of divorce-seeking couples.100 divorce-seeking couples completed measures of Couple Burnout Pains (CBM), Neuroticism component of Neo Personality Inventory) NEO-FFI(, Family of Origin (FOS), Relationship Beliefs (RBI) and Communication Patterns Questionnaire-Short Form (CPQ-SF) in Ardabil, Iran. The data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results showed that direct paths of neuroticism, relationship beliefs, positive and demand/withdraw communication patterns to marital burnout were significant. Also direct paths of neuroticism and relationship beliefs to demand/withdraw pattern; and Family of origin and relationship beliefs to positive pattern were significant. Also, the results of this study revealed that the indirect relationship between neuroticism and relationship beliefs to marital burnout through demand/withdraw pattern, and indirect relationship between family of origin and relationship beliefs to marital burnout through positive pattern were significant. The results of the present study shows that enduring vulnerabilities of couples lonely or with communication patterns can have a role in marital burnout in lifespan and also this result can help experts in process of premarital consultation and couple therapy.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • enduring vulnerabilities
  • demand/withdraw pattern
  • positive pattern
  • marital burnout
Bernard, M. E. (2009). Dispute irrational beliefs and teach rational beliefs: An interview with Albert Ellis. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy , 27, 66-76. Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1988). Individual difference variables in close relationships: A contextual model of marriage as an integrative framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 713-721. Buss, D. M. (1991). Conflict in married couples: Personality predictors of anger and upset. Journal of Personality, 59, 663-703. Byers, E. S. (2005). Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study of individuals in long-term relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 42, 113-118. Caughlin, J. P., Huston, T. L., & Houts, R. M. (2000). How does personality matter in marriage? An examination of trait anxiety, interpersonal negativity, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 326-336. Christensen, A., & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal. Personality and. Social Psychology, 59, 73-81. Christensen, A., & Sullaway, M. (1984). Communication Patterns Questionnaire. Unpublished Questionnaire, University of California, Los Angeles. Cote´, S., & Moskowitz, D. S. (1998). On the dynamic covariation between interpersonal behavior and affect: Prediction from Neuroticism, extraversion, and agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1032-1046. Crowley, A. K. (2006). The relationship of adult attachment style and interactive conflict styles to marital satisfaction. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy. Texas A & M University Day, R. (2003). Introduction to family processes. Landon: Erlbaum Association, Inc. Edelson, R. S., & Epestein, N. O. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship believes. Journal of Counseling and clinical psychology, 50, 715-720. Feeney, J. A. (1999). Adult romantic attachment and couple relationships. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment theory, research, and clinical application (pp: 355-377). New York: Guilford press. Geist, R. L., & Gilbert, D. G. (1996). Correlated of expressed and felt emotion during marital conflict: Satisfaction, personality, process, and outcome. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 49-60. Ghoroghi, S., Hassan, S. A., & Baba, M. (2012). Function of family-of-origin experiences and marital adjustment among married Iranian students of University of Putra Malaysia. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4, 94-103. Hamamci, Z. (2005). Dysfunctional relationship beliefs in marital conflict. Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, 23, 245-161. Heene, E. L., Buysse, A., Van Oost, P. (2005). Indirect pathways between depressive symptoms and marital distress: the role of conflict communication, attributions, and attachment style. Family Process, 44, 413-40. Hembrecht, M. (2009). The role of dysfunctional relationship beliefs in relationship satisfaction a comparison of singles with satisfied and less satisfied coupled people in their endorsement of irrational and anxious relationship beliefs. Master thesis, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Theses, University of Utrecht. Hovestadt, A. J., Anderson, W. T., Piercy, F. P., Cochran, S. W., & Fine, M. (1985). A family-of-origin scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11, 287-297. James,S., Huntly, J., & Hemsworth, D. (2002). Factor structure of relationship belief inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26, 729-755. Karney, B. R., Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-34. Karney, B. R., Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital interaction, and the trajectory of marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1075-1092. Kayser, K., & Rao, S. S. (2006). Process of disaffection in relationship breakdown. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Kiviniemi, A. A. I., Wasz-Hockert, O., Seitamo, L. K., Joskitt, L. O., Heikkinen, H. P., Moilanen, I. K., et al. (2011). The association between parental images and satisfaction in intimate relationships in a Northern Finland sample. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 70, 215-227. Klever, P. (2009). Goal direction and effectiveness, emotional maturity, and nuclear family functioning. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 3, 308-324. Kurdek, L. A. (1997). Relation between neuroticism and dimensions of relationship commitment: Evidence from gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 109-124. Larsen, J. H., Blick, R.W., Jackson, J. B., & Holman, T. B. (2010). Partner traits that predict relationship satisfaction for neurotic individuals in premarital relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 36, 430-444. Lavee, Y., & Ben-Ari, A. (2004). Emotional expressiveness and neuroticism: Do they predict marital quality? Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 620-627. Lindstrom, R. A. (2013). Cyclicality and the relationship between neuroticism, communication, and relationship satisfaction in cohabiting couples. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of science. Manhattan, Kansas state university. Muraru, A. A., & Turliuc, M. N. (2012). Family-of-origin, romantic attachment, and marital adjustment: a path analysis model. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 90-94. Niszczota, P. (2014). Neuroticism, uncertainty, and foreign investment. Department of International Finance (forthcoming), 1-36. O,leary, K. D. (1987). Assessment of marital discord. USA: Lawrence Erbium Associates Inc. Papero, D. V. (2000). Bowen systems theory. In F. M. Dattilio & L. J. Bevilacqua (Eds.), Comparative treatments for relationship dysfunction (pp. 58-78). New York: Springer Publishing. Pease, K. (2013). Differentiation of self and anxiety as a function of culture. A thesis for the degree of Master of Science, California State University, Stanislaus. Pytlik-Zillig, L. M. P., Hemenover, S. H., &, Dienstbier, R. A. (2002). What do we assess when we assess a big 5 trait? A content analysis of the affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes represented in big 5 personality inventories. Faculty Publications, Department of Psychology, 28, 847-858. Riggio, H., & Weiser, D. (2008). Attitude toward Marriage: Embeddedness and outcomes in personal relationships. Personal relationships, 15, 123-140. Robins, R. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2000). Two personalities, one relationship: Both partners’ personality traits shape the quality of their relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 251-259. Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., & Shimkowski, J. R. (2014). A meta-analytical review of the demand/withdraw pattern of interaction and its associations with individual, relational, and communicative outcomes. Communication Monographs, 81, 28-58. Shahmoradi, S., Etemadi, O., Bahrami, F., Fatehizadeh, M., & Ahmadi, A. (2013). Personality characteristics, self-esteem and attachment styles as predictors for demand/withdraw marital communicational cycle. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3, 136-141. Sine Egeci, I., & Gençöz, T. (2006). Factors associated with relationship satisfaction: Importance of communication skills. Contemporary Family Therapy, 28, 383-391. Sprecher, S., & Cate, R. M. (2004). Sexual satisfaction and sexual expression as predictors of relationship satisfaction and stability. In J. H. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 235-256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Wayne, J. H., Musisca, N., & Fleeson. W. (2004). Considering the role of personality in the work-family experience: Relationships of the big five to work-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 108-130. Whitton, S. W., Waldinger, R. J., Schulz, M. S., Allen, J. P., Crowell, J. A., Hauser, S. T. (2008). Prospective associations from family-of-origin interactions to adult marital interactions and relationship adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 274-286. Willoughby, B. J. (2015). the role of marital beliefs as a component of positive relationship functioning. Journal Adult Development, 22, 76-89. Young, M. E., & Long, L. L. (2007). Counseling and therapy for couples. CA: Brooks/Cole. Zwicker, A. E. (2013). Understanding divorce in the context of stepfamilies. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy. Faculty of Graduate Studies (Psychology). The University of British Columbia, Vancouver.